Digital resilience is now essential for continuity, trust, and effective governance. Organizations operate in an increasingly complex landscape of cyber threats, compliance obligations, and technological dependencies. At the same time, we often see that security efforts are fragmented: policies and practices are not sufficiently aligned, responsibilities are unclear, and structural embedding in governance is lacking.

At QA Consulting, we believe it’s time for a structural and strategic approach to security. The focus should not be on incidents, standards, or tools, but on the organization’s ability to sustainably manage risks, compliance, and resilience—across people, processes, and technology.

A future-proof security strategy requires insight, coherence, and maturity. This includes defining responsibilities and coordination mechanisms, structurally improving collaboration in the value chain, assessing cultural and organizational resilience, and achieving continuous compliance monitoring and adaptive governance.

We do this based on thorough analysis and proven best practices, offering the following services:

Quality Assurance

  • Security governance assessment & programmatic reviews
  • Strategic risk management & compliance coaching
  • Compliance Readiness Review

Advisory

  • Risk & Compliance Readiness Scan
  • NIS2/DORA Impact Analysis
  • Security strategy development
  • Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM)
  • Cyber resilience analysis at the value chain level
  • Security Operating Model design

Interim Management

  • Interim CISO or Security Lead
  • Security Transition or Program Manager
  • Risk & Compliance Coordinator

Practical Questions

  • Are we as an organization sufficiently equipped to structurally manage risks and compliance?
  • Do we need a SOC, and if so, should we build it ourselves or outsource it?
  • What do NIS2 or DORA require from our organization, and how do we address these fundamentally?
  • How can we make our resilience and vulnerabilities visible, instead of reacting after the fact?
  • What structural coordination and capabilities are we missing to maintain control over risks and the value chain?
  • How do we build support for a new way of thinking about security?